Mimesis Public Repo Alignment Gate - 2026-05-30

이 artifact는 Mimesis Engineering의 공개 repo들이 존재한다는 증거와, 그 repo들이 아직 증명하지 못하는 것을 분리한다. 목적은 강한 이름을 더 크게 말하는 것이 아니라, 공개 README, 블로그 hub, prompt pack, casebook이 같은 claim boundary를 쓰게 만드는 것이다.

Claim

mimesis-engineering, mimesis-canvas, mimesis-casebook은 public artifact existence를 증명한다. 즉, 방법론 설명, worksheet, public case notes가 실제로 공개되어 있다. 그러나 이 사실만으로 external adoption, customer outcome, repeatable consulting result, industry standard, legal/investment/security advice는 증명되지 않는다.

Do not claim external adoption from these repos. 현재 허용되는 주장은 “public working frame plus public artifacts"이다.

Source Snapshot

source	observed through	current evidence
svy04/mimesis-engineering	`gh repo view` + README + `PROOF-BOUNDARY.md`	Public repo. README maps manifesto, framework, glossary, proof boundary, prompts, examples, cases. Proof boundary says it is a public working frame and does not claim industry standard or proven customer outcomes. No top-level license was observed, so do not overclaim legal reuse rights.
svy04/mimesis-canvas	`gh repo view` + README + `canvas.en.md` + `canvas.ko.md`	Public repo. Canvas asks for desired artifact, strong artifacts, knowledge structure, visual structure, user flow, do-not-copy, transformation, and seven-day version. It states the canvas sets a better standard but does not guarantee outcomes. No top-level license was observed, so “reusable” means publicly viewable/operable template unless a license is added.
svy04/mimesis-casebook	`gh repo view` + README + case files 001-004	Public repo. Case notes exist for QuantFlow -> Alpha Court, blog homepage, GitHub profile, and LinkedIn positioning. This is more than an empty container, but the notes are still directional records rather than evidence-rich proof packets. Each case leaves a next proof artifact such as redacted walkthrough, before/after screenshot, reader feedback, issue, PR, requests, or comments.
Mimesis Engineering hub	local Hugo content	Defines Mimesis as verified originals -> decomposition -> ontology -> commands/redlines -> output contract -> golden examples -> validation -> memory, while rejecting universal methodology and industry-standard claims.
Mimesis Prompt Pack	local Hugo content	Treats the ten prompts as field/source/failure scan, not the whole method.
QuantFlow -> Alpha Court case	local Hugo content	Public directional case. It does not prove Alpha Court performance, external market validation, retention, trust, or revenue.

Alignment Map

public surface	what it proves	what remains unproven	next proof
Mimesis Engineering repo	The framework, proof boundary, prompt, example, and case folders are publicly reachable.	External use, customer outcomes, universal methodology status.	Reconcile README proof boundary with blog hub after every major claim change.
Mimesis Canvas repo	A public worksheet exists in Korean and English, and a filled site canvas now applies it to this blog.	Legal reuse rights beyond the current public repo, improved user outcomes, or external team adoption.	Add a license if broader reuse is intended, then add before/after screenshots or external usage evidence.
Mimesis Casebook repo	Public casebook and four directional case notes exist.	Evidence-rich before/after proof packs, finished portfolio quality, external client result, or repeatable commercial service.	Add source cards, diffs, screenshots, validation output, reader feedback, external issue/PR, or external request/comment evidence.
Blog hub and prompt pack	The method is explained publicly with templates and examples.	That the method is standard, validated by the market, or commercially proven.	Keep proof ledger rows tied to actual source snapshots and live route checks.

Commands / Redlines

command	redline
Treat public repos as source artifacts.	Do not treat repository existence as adoption.
Link the repo proof boundary from the blog proof ledger.	Do not let the blog imply stronger claims than the repos themselves make.
Treat casebook entries as case notes with next proof artifacts.	Do not call them finished client case studies.
Treat canvas as a public worksheet.	Do not imply broad legal reuse rights or guaranteed better output without license/outcome proof.
Keep Mimesis Audit as offer draft plus self-applied sample.	Do not claim repeatable consulting outcomes until external or redacted proof exists.

Output Contract

Future Mimesis public claim changes should include:

field	required evidence
Public repo state	`gh repo view` visibility, pushed date, default branch, and current README/manifest/proof-boundary snapshot.
Blog hub state	Local content path and route proof for the updated public page.
Case state	Case note path, source artifact, changed artifact, screenshots or diffs when available, what remains unproven, and next proof artifact.
Adoption evidence	External issue, PR, comment, audit request, client-redacted sample, or reproducible usage transcript.
Claim boundary	Explicit allowed and forbidden public claims.

Validation

Expected verification:

npm run check:quality
npm run check:surface-contracts
npm run check:surfaces
npm run check
npm run check:routes
npm run check:live

Claim Boundary

Allowed public claim:

Mimesis Engineering now has a public method repo, a public canvas repo, a public casebook repo, a blog hub, a prompt pack, and self-applied proof artifacts.

Forbidden public claims:

Do not claim external adoption.
Do not claim proven customer outcomes.
Do not claim the method is an industry standard.
Do not claim Mimesis Audit is a commercially proven consulting product.
Do not treat casebook entries as finished client portfolio evidence.
Do not imply broad legal reuse rights for public templates until licensing is explicit.

Memory Update

Keep the repo/blog alignment rule as a standing Mimesis surface gate: every stronger public claim must point to the repo artifact, the blog artifact, the case artifact, and the next proof artifact that would make the claim stronger.